BackGlobal Ship Lease- 8% NT REDEEM 31/12/2024 USD 25 Overview

Global Ship Lease- 8% NT REDEEM 31/12/2024 USD 25 Receivables

Latest receivables for GSLD: $52M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Receivables
$51.81M
74.98% YoYΔ $22.20M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Global Ship Lease- 8% NT REDEEM 31/12/2024 USD 25 Receivables History

Loading

Global Ship Lease- 8% NT REDEEM 31/12/2024 USD 25 vs. peers: Receivables Comparison

Loading

Global Ship Lease- 8% NT REDEEM 31/12/2024 USD 25 Receivables Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Global Ship Lease- 8% NT REDEEM 31/12/2024 USD 25 (GSLD) FAQ

Global Ship Lease- 8% NT REDEEM 31/12/2024 USD 25 posts a receivables of $52M as of June 2026. That compares with $30M in the prior-year period — up 75.0% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Global Ship Lease- 8% NT REDEEM 31/12/2024 USD 25's receivables was $30M. The latest reading is $52M — a 75.0% year-over-year increase (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Receivables is one piece of Global Ship Lease- 8% NT REDEEM 31/12/2024 USD 25's financial statement story. At $52M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for GSLD's receivables usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Global Ship Lease- 8% NT REDEEM 31/12/2024 USD 25's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Global Ship Lease- 8% NT REDEEM 31/12/2024 USD 25 against Industrials peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Industrials are more comparable, which makes gaps in receivables easier to interpret. Start with $52M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.