BackGroupon Overview

Groupon Receivables

Track Groupon's receivables ($20M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Receivables
$20.01M
↓ 37.59% YoYΔ $-12.05M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Groupon Receivables History

Loading

Groupon vs. peers: Receivables Comparison

Loading

Groupon Receivables Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Balance Sheet Breakdown

Current CashShort Term InvestmentsReceivablesInventoryOther Current AssetsCurrent AssetsLong Term InvestmentsProperty Plant EquipmentGoodwillIntangible AssetsOther AssetsTotal AssetsNet Tangible AssetsAccounts PayableOther Current LiabilitiesTotal Current LiabilitiesLong Term DebtOther LiabilitiesMinority InterestTotal Liabilities

Groupon (GRPN) FAQ

Groupon (GRPN) currently reports a receivables of $20M as of March 2026. That compares with $32M in the prior-year period — down 37.6% year over year. Use the charts on this page to explore Groupon's receivables history and peer comparisons.

Groupon's receivables decreased from $32M to $20M — a 37.6% year-over-year decrease (period ending March 2026). Watching multi-year history on the chart below helps separate one-off swings from a lasting trend.

Groupon reported $20M in receivables as of March 2026. That compares with $32M in the prior-year period — down 37.6% year over year. Absolute dollar amounts are most useful when compared with prior periods, peers, and related line items such as revenue, assets, or liabilities on Stockcircle.

Start with the current receivables of $20M, then check the historical chart for trend and the peer comparison chart for relative positioning. From there, open related valuation or income-statement pages for Groupon, and consider following GRPN for alerts when major investors trade the stock.

Groupon is classified in the Consumer Discretionary sector. On receivables, it currently shows $20M. Sector peers often share similar capital intensity and growth regimes, so relative rankings inside Consumer Discretionary are usually more informative than comparing GRPN with unrelated industries.