BackGranite Point Mortgage Trust Overview

Granite Point Mortgage Trust Total Liabilities

Track Granite Point Mortgage Trust's total liabilities ($980M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Total Liabilities
$982.36M
26.35% YoYΔ $-351.40M vs prior year quarter

Peer average / median

Loading

Granite Point Mortgage Trust Total Liabilities History

Loading

Granite Point Mortgage Trust vs. peers: Total Liabilities Comparison

Loading

Granite Point Mortgage Trust Total Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Granite Point Mortgage Trust (GPMT) FAQ

Granite Point Mortgage Trust posts a total liabilities of $980M as of June 2026. That compares with $1.3B in the prior-year period — down 26.3% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Granite Point Mortgage Trust's total liabilities was $1.3B. The latest reading is $980M — a 26.3% year-over-year decrease (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Total Liabilities is one piece of Granite Point Mortgage Trust's financial statement story. At $980M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for GPMT's total liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Granite Point Mortgage Trust's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Granite Point Mortgage Trust against Real Estate peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Real Estate are more comparable, which makes gaps in total liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $980M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.