BackG Medical Innovations Holdings Overview

G Medical Innovations Holdings Inventory

Track G Medical Innovations Holdings's inventory ($290K) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Inventory
$292000.00
↓ 17.75% YoYΔ $-63000.00 vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

G Medical Innovations Holdings Inventory History

Loading

G Medical Innovations Holdings vs. peers: Inventory Comparison

Loading

G Medical Innovations Holdings Inventory Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

G Medical Innovations Holdings (GMVDF) FAQ

G Medical Innovations Holdings posts a inventory of $290K as of December 2022. That compares with $360K in the prior-year period — down 17.7% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, G Medical Innovations Holdings's inventory was $360K. The latest reading is $290K — a 17.7% year-over-year decrease (period ending December 2022). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Inventory is one piece of G Medical Innovations Holdings's financial statement story. At $290K, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for GMVDF's inventory usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; G Medical Innovations Holdings's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging G Medical Innovations Holdings against Healthcare peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Healthcare are more comparable, which makes gaps in inventory easier to interpret. Start with $290K here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.