BackGlobal Engine Group Holding Limited Ordinary Shares Overview

Global Engine Group Holding Limited Ordinary Shares Receivables

Latest receivables for GLE: $8.5M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Receivables
$8.51M
↓ 34.40% YoYΔ $-4.46M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Global Engine Group Holding Limited Ordinary Shares Receivables History

Loading

Global Engine Group Holding Limited Ordinary Shares vs. peers: Receivables Comparison

Loading

Global Engine Group Holding Limited Ordinary Shares Receivables Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Global Engine Group Holding Limited Ordinary Shares (GLE) FAQ

Global Engine Group Holding Limited Ordinary Shares posts a receivables of $8.5M as of December 2025. That compares with $13M in the prior-year period — down 34.4% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Global Engine Group Holding Limited Ordinary Shares's receivables was $13M. The latest reading is $8.5M — a 34.4% year-over-year decrease (period ending December 2025). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Receivables is one piece of Global Engine Group Holding Limited Ordinary Shares's financial statement story. At $8.5M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for GLE's receivables usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Global Engine Group Holding Limited Ordinary Shares's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Global Engine Group Holding Limited Ordinary Shares against Technology peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Technology are more comparable, which makes gaps in receivables easier to interpret. Start with $8.5M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.