BackGladstone Capital - 5.375% NT REDEEM 01/11/2024 USD Overview

Gladstone Capital - 5.375% NT REDEEM 01/11/2024 USD Total Current Liabilities

Track Gladstone Capital - 5.375% NT REDEEM 01/11/2024 USD's total current liabilities ($250M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Total Current Liabilities
$252.38M

Peer average / median

Loading

Gladstone Capital - 5.375% NT REDEEM 01/11/2024 USD Total Current Liabilities History

Loading

Gladstone Capital - 5.375% NT REDEEM 01/11/2024 USD vs. peers: Total Current Liabilities Comparison

Loading

Gladstone Capital - 5.375% NT REDEEM 01/11/2024 USD Total Current Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Gladstone Capital - 5.375% NT REDEEM 01/11/2024 USD (GLADL) FAQ

Gladstone Capital - 5.375% NT REDEEM 01/11/2024 USD posts a total current liabilities of $250M as of June 2026. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

Total Current Liabilities is one piece of Gladstone Capital - 5.375% NT REDEEM 01/11/2024 USD's financial statement story. At $250M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for GLADL's total current liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Gladstone Capital - 5.375% NT REDEEM 01/11/2024 USD's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Gladstone Capital - 5.375% NT REDEEM 01/11/2024 USD against Finance peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Finance are more comparable, which makes gaps in total current liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $250M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.