BackGreenTree Hospitality Group Overview

GreenTree Hospitality Group Net Tangible Assets

Latest net tangible assets for GHG: $1.6B.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Net Tangible Assets
$1.63B
3.78% YoYΔ $-63.86M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

GreenTree Hospitality Group Net Tangible Assets History

Loading

GreenTree Hospitality Group vs. peers: Net Tangible Assets Comparison

Loading

GreenTree Hospitality Group Net Tangible Assets Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

GreenTree Hospitality Group (GHG) FAQ

GreenTree Hospitality Group posts a net tangible assets of $1.6B as of March 2026. That compares with $1.7B in the prior-year period — down 3.8% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, GreenTree Hospitality Group's net tangible assets was $1.7B. The latest reading is $1.6B — a 3.8% year-over-year decrease (period ending March 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Net Tangible Assets is one piece of GreenTree Hospitality Group's financial statement story. At $1.6B, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for GHG's net tangible assets usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; GreenTree Hospitality Group's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging GreenTree Hospitality Group against Consumer Discretionary peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Consumer Discretionary are more comparable, which makes gaps in net tangible assets easier to interpret. Start with $1.6B here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.