BackWisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund Overview

WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund Receivables

Latest receivables for GDT: $680M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Receivables
$679.20M
0.32% YoYΔ $-2.20M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund Receivables History

Loading

WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund vs. peers: Receivables Comparison

Loading

WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund Receivables Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund (GDT) FAQ

WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund posts a receivables of $680M as of April 2026. That compares with $680M in the prior-year period — down 0.3% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund's receivables was $680M. The latest reading is $680M — a 0.3% year-over-year decrease (period ending April 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Receivables is one piece of WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund's financial statement story. At $680M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for GDT's receivables usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund against Finance peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Finance are more comparable, which makes gaps in receivables easier to interpret. Start with $680M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.