BackInvesco Exchange-Traded Fund Trust II - Invesco MSCI Green Building ETF Overview

Invesco Exchange-Traded Fund Trust II - Invesco MSCI Green Building ETF EBIT

Latest ebit for GBLD: $-240K, below the sector sector average of $2.6T.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow

Quarterly EBIT

-$166.70K
↓ 215.03% YoY

As of Aug 31, 2020

Annual EBIT (TTM)

-$243.05K
↓ 53.01% YoY

Trailing 12 months ending Aug 31, 2020

Average EBIT (Comparison Companies)

EBIT History

EBIT Comparison

Annual EBIT Growth Rate (%)

Annual EBIT Growth (Absolute)

Invesco Exchange-Traded Fund Trust II - Invesco MSCI Green Building ETF (GBLD) FAQ

Invesco Exchange-Traded Fund Trust II - Invesco MSCI Green Building ETF's ebit stands at $-240K as of August 2020. That compares with $-160K in the prior-year period — down 53.0% year over year. That is below the sector sector average of $2.6T. Stockcircle updates this page with the newest filings so you can track how the metric evolves quarter by quarter.

Invesco Exchange-Traded Fund Trust II - Invesco MSCI Green Building ETF reported $-240K in EBIT versus $-160K a year earlier — a 53.0% year-over-year decrease. The historical chart on this page makes it easier to see whether that move is part of a longer pattern.

Invesco Exchange-Traded Fund Trust II - Invesco MSCI Green Building ETF sits lower the its sector benchmark ($2.6T) with a EBIT of $-240K. That is roughly 100.0% below the sector mean. Peer context matters because what looks expensive or cheap in absolute terms can be normal for the sector.

That compares with $-160K in the prior-year period — down 53.0% year over year. Sustained growth in EBIT can support a stronger franchise, while sharp declines may reflect divestitures, weaker demand, or accounting changes. Always read YoY moves with the footnotes of recent filings in mind.

The history chart shows how Invesco Exchange-Traded Fund Trust II - Invesco MSCI Green Building ETF's EBIT evolved across reporting periods, while the comparison chart places GBLD next to similar companies. Use both: a rising metric that still lags peers tells a different story than a rising metric that already leads the group. Growth charts, when available, highlight acceleration or slowdown.