BackFirst Watch Restaurant Group Overview

First Watch Restaurant Group Total Liabilities

Latest total liabilities for FWRG: $1.2B.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Total Liabilities
$1.19B
10.42% YoYΔ $111.99M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

First Watch Restaurant Group Total Liabilities History

Loading

First Watch Restaurant Group vs. peers: Total Liabilities Comparison

Loading

First Watch Restaurant Group Total Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

First Watch Restaurant Group (FWRG) FAQ

First Watch Restaurant Group posts a total liabilities of $1.2B as of June 2026. That compares with $1.1B in the prior-year period — up 10.4% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, First Watch Restaurant Group's total liabilities was $1.1B. The latest reading is $1.2B — a 10.4% year-over-year increase (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Total Liabilities is one piece of First Watch Restaurant Group's financial statement story. At $1.2B, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for FWRG's total liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; First Watch Restaurant Group's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging First Watch Restaurant Group against Consumer Staples peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Consumer Staples are more comparable, which makes gaps in total liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $1.2B here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.