BackFTS International Class A Overview

FTS International Class A Other Current Liabilities

Latest other current liabilities for FTSI: $14M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Other Current Liabilities
$14.10M
47.78% YoYΔ $-12.90M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

FTS International Class A Other Current Liabilities History

Loading

FTS International Class A vs. peers: Other Current Liabilities Comparison

Loading

FTS International Class A Other Current Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

FTS International Class A (FTSI) FAQ

FTS International Class A posts a other current liabilities of $14M as of September 2021. That compares with $27M in the prior-year period — down 47.8% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, FTS International Class A's other current liabilities was $27M. The latest reading is $14M — a 47.8% year-over-year decrease (period ending September 2021). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Other Current Liabilities is one piece of FTS International Class A's financial statement story. At $14M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for FTSI's other current liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; FTS International Class A's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging FTS International Class A against Energy peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Energy are more comparable, which makes gaps in other current liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $14M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.