BackFlexible Solutions International Overview

Flexible Solutions International Total Liabilities

Latest total liabilities for FSI: $21M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Total Liabilities
$21.30M
6.96% YoYΔ $1.39M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Flexible Solutions International Total Liabilities History

Loading

Flexible Solutions International vs. peers: Total Liabilities Comparison

Loading

Flexible Solutions International Total Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Flexible Solutions International (FSI) FAQ

Flexible Solutions International posts a total liabilities of $21M as of March 2026. That compares with $20M in the prior-year period — up 7.0% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Flexible Solutions International's total liabilities was $20M. The latest reading is $21M — a 7.0% year-over-year increase (period ending March 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Total Liabilities is one piece of Flexible Solutions International's financial statement story. At $21M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for FSI's total liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Flexible Solutions International's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Flexible Solutions International against Consumer Discretionary peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Consumer Discretionary are more comparable, which makes gaps in total liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $21M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.