BackFiesta Restaurant Group Overview

Fiesta Restaurant Group Total Current Liabilities

Latest total current liabilities for FRGI: $41M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Total Current Liabilities
$40.95M
8.34% YoYΔ $-3.72M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Fiesta Restaurant Group Total Current Liabilities History

Loading

Fiesta Restaurant Group vs. peers: Total Current Liabilities Comparison

Loading

Fiesta Restaurant Group Total Current Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Fiesta Restaurant Group (FRGI) FAQ

Fiesta Restaurant Group posts a total current liabilities of $41M as of July 2023. That compares with $45M in the prior-year period — down 8.3% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Fiesta Restaurant Group's total current liabilities was $45M. The latest reading is $41M — a 8.3% year-over-year decrease (period ending July 2023). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Total Current Liabilities is one piece of Fiesta Restaurant Group's financial statement story. At $41M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for FRGI's total current liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Fiesta Restaurant Group's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Fiesta Restaurant Group against Consumer Staples peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Consumer Staples are more comparable, which makes gaps in total current liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $41M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.