BackWhole Earth Brands- Warrants (30/04/2026) Overview

Whole Earth Brands- Warrants (30/04/2026) Receivables

Latest receivables for FREEW: $73M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Receivables
$73.11M
3.74% YoYΔ $2.64M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Whole Earth Brands- Warrants (30/04/2026) Receivables History

Loading

Whole Earth Brands- Warrants (30/04/2026) vs. peers: Receivables Comparison

Loading

Whole Earth Brands- Warrants (30/04/2026) Receivables Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Whole Earth Brands- Warrants (30/04/2026) (FREEW) FAQ

Whole Earth Brands- Warrants (30/04/2026) posts a receivables of $73M as of June 2024. That compares with $70M in the prior-year period — up 3.7% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Whole Earth Brands- Warrants (30/04/2026)'s receivables was $70M. The latest reading is $73M — a 3.7% year-over-year increase (period ending June 2024). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Receivables is one piece of Whole Earth Brands- Warrants (30/04/2026)'s financial statement story. At $73M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for FREEW's receivables usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Whole Earth Brands- Warrants (30/04/2026)'s other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Whole Earth Brands- Warrants (30/04/2026) against Consumer Staples peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Consumer Staples are more comparable, which makes gaps in receivables easier to interpret. Start with $73M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.