BackFirst Midwest Bancorp Overview

First Midwest Bancorp Total Current Liabilities

First Midwest Bancorp's total current liabilities is $320M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Total Current Liabilities
$317.18M
98.25% YoYΔ $-17.83B vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

First Midwest Bancorp Total Current Liabilities History

Loading

First Midwest Bancorp vs. peers: Total Current Liabilities Comparison

Loading

First Midwest Bancorp Total Current Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

First Midwest Bancorp (FMBI) FAQ

First Midwest Bancorp posts a total current liabilities of $320M as of December 2021. That compares with $18B in the prior-year period — down 98.3% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, First Midwest Bancorp's total current liabilities was $18B. The latest reading is $320M — a 98.3% year-over-year decrease (period ending December 2021). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Total Current Liabilities is one piece of First Midwest Bancorp's financial statement story. At $320M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for FMBI's total current liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; First Midwest Bancorp's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging First Midwest Bancorp against Finance peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Finance are more comparable, which makes gaps in total current liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $320M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.