BackFlexsteel Industries Overview

Flexsteel Industries Total Current Liabilities

Track Flexsteel Industries's total current liabilities ($58M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Total Current Liabilities
$58.23M
8.85% YoYΔ $4.73M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Flexsteel Industries Total Current Liabilities History

Loading

Flexsteel Industries vs. peers: Total Current Liabilities Comparison

Loading

Flexsteel Industries Total Current Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Flexsteel Industries (FLXS) FAQ

Flexsteel Industries posts a total current liabilities of $58M as of March 2026. That compares with $53M in the prior-year period — up 8.8% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Flexsteel Industries's total current liabilities was $53M. The latest reading is $58M — a 8.8% year-over-year increase (period ending March 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Total Current Liabilities is one piece of Flexsteel Industries's financial statement story. At $58M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for FLXS's total current liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Flexsteel Industries's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Flexsteel Industries against Consumer Discretionary peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Consumer Discretionary are more comparable, which makes gaps in total current liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $58M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.