BackFirst Trust Exchange-Traded Fund III - First Trust Global Engineering Overview

First Trust Exchange-Traded Fund III - First Trust Global Engineering EBIT

First Trust Exchange-Traded Fund III - First Trust Global Engineering's EBIT is $-290M, below the sector sector average of $2.6T.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow

Quarterly EBIT

$9.21K
↑ 100.02% YoY

As of Mar 31, 2020

Annual EBIT (TTM)

-$286.81M
↑ 76.08% YoY

Trailing 12 months ending Mar 31, 2020

Average EBIT (Comparison Companies)

EBIT History

EBIT Comparison

Annual EBIT Growth Rate (%)

Annual EBIT Growth (Absolute)

First Trust Exchange-Traded Fund III - First Trust Global Engineering (FLM) FAQ

The latest EBIT for FLM is $-290M as of March 2020. That compares with $-1.2B in the prior-year period — up 76.1% year over year. That is below the sector sector average of $2.6T. Investors often review this figure alongside First Trust Exchange-Traded Fund III - First Trust Global Engineering's historical trend and sector peers before judging valuation or financial health.

Over the past year, FLM's EBIT moved from $-1.2B to $-290M — a 76.1% year-over-year increase. If the trend continues in the same direction for several quarters, it can signal a meaningful shift in First Trust Exchange-Traded Fund III - First Trust Global Engineering's operating scale or balance-sheet position.

Against its sector companies, FLM currently prints $-290M for EBIT, while the sector average sits near $2.6T. That is roughly 100.0% below the sector mean. Large gaps often invite a closer look at First Trust Exchange-Traded Fund III - First Trust Global Engineering's growth, margins, and balance sheet.

A EBIT figure of $-290M for FLM is a snapshot of scale on that line item. On its own it does not say whether the business is healthy — you also want growth rate, margins, and how the number compares with similar companies. The sector average is about $2.6T. Explore the charts below for those layers of context.

After noting FLM's EBIT ($-290M), review year-over-year change from $-1.2B, peer averages, and a few neighboring metrics such as revenue, margins, or valuation multiples. That combination usually beats staring at a single figure. The navigation links on this page jump you to those related views.