BackFTAC Emerald Acquisition - Warrants (19/10/2028) Overview

FTAC Emerald Acquisition - Warrants (19/10/2028) Net Income

Track FTAC Emerald Acquisition - Warrants (19/10/2028)'s net income ($-73M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow

Quarterly Net Income

-$9.65M
171.89% YoY

As of Jun 2026

Annual Net Income (TTM)

-$72.96M
361.9% YoY

Trailing 12 months ending Jun 2026

Average Net Income (Comparison Companies)

Loading

Net Income History

Loading

Net Income Comparison

Loading

Annual Net Income Growth Rate (%)

Loading...

Annual Net Income Growth (Absolute)

Loading...

FTAC Emerald Acquisition - Warrants (19/10/2028) (FLDDW) FAQ

FTAC Emerald Acquisition - Warrants (19/10/2028)'s net income stands at $-73M as of June 2026. That compares with $28M in the prior-year period — down 361.9% year over year. That is below the sector sector average of $96M. Stockcircle updates this page with the newest filings so you can track how the metric evolves quarter by quarter.

FTAC Emerald Acquisition - Warrants (19/10/2028) reported $-73M in net income versus $28M a year earlier — a 361.9% year-over-year decrease. The historical chart on this page makes it easier to see whether that move is part of a longer pattern.

FTAC Emerald Acquisition - Warrants (19/10/2028) sits lower the its sector benchmark ($96M) with a net income of $-73M. That is roughly 175.7% below the sector mean. Peer context matters because what looks expensive or cheap in absolute terms can be normal for the sector.

That compares with $28M in the prior-year period — down 361.9% year over year. Sustained growth in net income can support a stronger franchise, while sharp declines may reflect divestitures, weaker demand, or accounting changes. Always read YoY moves with the footnotes of recent filings in mind.

The history chart shows how FTAC Emerald Acquisition - Warrants (19/10/2028)'s net income evolved across reporting periods, while the comparison chart places FLDDW next to similar companies. Use both: a rising metric that still lags peers tells a different story than a rising metric that already leads the group. Growth charts, when available, highlight acceleration or slowdown.