BackFirst Financial Northwest Overview

First Financial Northwest Net Tangible Assets

First Financial Northwest's net tangible assets is $160M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Net Tangible Assets
$161.56M
0.06% YoYΔ $-105000.00 vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

First Financial Northwest Net Tangible Assets History

Loading

First Financial Northwest vs. peers: Net Tangible Assets Comparison

Loading

First Financial Northwest Net Tangible Assets Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

First Financial Northwest (FFNW) FAQ

First Financial Northwest posts a net tangible assets of $160M as of December 2024. That compares with $160M in the prior-year period — down 0.1% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, First Financial Northwest's net tangible assets was $160M. The latest reading is $160M — a 0.1% year-over-year decrease (period ending December 2024). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Net Tangible Assets is one piece of First Financial Northwest's financial statement story. At $160M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for FFNW's net tangible assets usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; First Financial Northwest's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging First Financial Northwest against Finance peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Finance are more comparable, which makes gaps in net tangible assets easier to interpret. Start with $160M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.