BackFactset Research Systems Overview

Factset Research Systems Total Current Liabilities

Latest total current liabilities for FDS: $1.1B.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Total Current Liabilities
$1.09B
↑ 109.54% YoYΔ $571.02M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Factset Research Systems Total Current Liabilities History

Loading

Factset Research Systems vs. peers: Total Current Liabilities Comparison

Loading

Factset Research Systems Total Current Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Factset Research Systems (FDS) FAQ

Factset Research Systems posts a total current liabilities of $1.1B as of August 2026. That compares with $520M in the prior-year period — up 109.5% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Factset Research Systems's total current liabilities was $520M. The latest reading is $1.1B — a 109.5% year-over-year increase (period ending August 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Total Current Liabilities is one piece of Factset Research Systems's financial statement story. At $1.1B, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for FDS's total current liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Factset Research Systems's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Factset Research Systems against Technology peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Technology are more comparable, which makes gaps in total current liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $1.1B here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.