BackEquitrans Midstream Overview

Equitrans Midstream Other Current Liabilities

Track Equitrans Midstream's other current liabilities ($300M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Other Current Liabilities
$301.55M
3.82% YoYΔ $-11.98M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Equitrans Midstream Other Current Liabilities History

Loading

Equitrans Midstream vs. peers: Other Current Liabilities Comparison

Loading

Equitrans Midstream Other Current Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Equitrans Midstream (ETRN) FAQ

Equitrans Midstream posts a other current liabilities of $300M as of June 2024. That compares with $310M in the prior-year period — down 3.8% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Equitrans Midstream's other current liabilities was $310M. The latest reading is $300M — a 3.8% year-over-year decrease (period ending June 2024). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Other Current Liabilities is one piece of Equitrans Midstream's financial statement story. At $300M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for ETRN's other current liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Equitrans Midstream's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Equitrans Midstream against Energy peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Energy are more comparable, which makes gaps in other current liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $300M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.