BackEnergy Services of America Overview

Energy Services of America Total Liabilities

Track Energy Services of America's total liabilities ($140M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Total Liabilities
$135.45M
3.94% YoYΔ $-5.56M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Energy Services of America Total Liabilities History

Loading

Energy Services of America vs. peers: Total Liabilities Comparison

Loading

Energy Services of America Total Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Energy Services of America (ESOA) FAQ

Energy Services of America posts a total liabilities of $140M as of June 2026. That compares with $140M in the prior-year period — down 3.9% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Energy Services of America's total liabilities was $140M. The latest reading is $140M — a 3.9% year-over-year decrease (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Total Liabilities is one piece of Energy Services of America's financial statement story. At $140M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for ESOA's total liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Energy Services of America's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Energy Services of America against Utilities peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Utilities are more comparable, which makes gaps in total liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $140M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.