BackErnexa Therapeutics Warrants Overview

Ernexa Therapeutics Warrants Receivables

Track Ernexa Therapeutics Warrants's receivables ($83K) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Receivables
$83000.00
↓ 46.10% YoYΔ $-71000.00 vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Ernexa Therapeutics Warrants Receivables History

Loading

Ernexa Therapeutics Warrants vs. peers: Receivables Comparison

Loading

Ernexa Therapeutics Warrants Receivables Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Ernexa Therapeutics Warrants (ERNAW) FAQ

Ernexa Therapeutics Warrants posts a receivables of $83K as of June 2026. That compares with $150K in the prior-year period — down 46.1% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Ernexa Therapeutics Warrants's receivables was $150K. The latest reading is $83K — a 46.1% year-over-year decrease (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Receivables is one piece of Ernexa Therapeutics Warrants's financial statement story. At $83K, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for ERNAW's receivables usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Ernexa Therapeutics Warrants's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Ernexa Therapeutics Warrants against Telecommunications peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Telecommunications are more comparable, which makes gaps in receivables easier to interpret. Start with $83K here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.