BackEn+ Group International public joint-stock company Overview

En+ Group International public joint-stock company Receivables

En+ Group International public joint-stock company's receivables is $1B.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Receivables
$1.05B
↓ 12.16% YoYΔ $-145.00M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

En+ Group International public joint-stock company Receivables History

Loading

En+ Group International public joint-stock company vs. peers: Receivables Comparison

Loading

En+ Group International public joint-stock company Receivables Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

En+ Group International public joint-stock company (ENPG.ME) FAQ

En+ Group International public joint-stock company posts a receivables of $1B as of December 2023. That compares with $1.2B in the prior-year period — down 12.2% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, En+ Group International public joint-stock company's receivables was $1.2B. The latest reading is $1B — a 12.2% year-over-year decrease (period ending December 2023). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Receivables is one piece of En+ Group International public joint-stock company's financial statement story. At $1B, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for ENPG.ME's receivables usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; En+ Group International public joint-stock company's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging En+ Group International public joint-stock company against Materials peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Materials are more comparable, which makes gaps in receivables easier to interpret. Start with $1B here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.