BackEquity Lifestyle Properties Overview

Equity Lifestyle Properties Minority Interest

Track Equity Lifestyle Properties's minority interest ($58M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Minority Interest
$58.44M
28.86% YoYΔ $-23.70M vs prior year quarter

Peer average / median

Loading

Equity Lifestyle Properties Minority Interest History

Loading

Equity Lifestyle Properties vs. peers: Minority Interest Comparison

Loading

Equity Lifestyle Properties Minority Interest Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Equity Lifestyle Properties (ELS) FAQ

Equity Lifestyle Properties posts a minority interest of $58M as of June 2026. That compares with $82M in the prior-year period — down 28.9% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Equity Lifestyle Properties's minority interest was $82M. The latest reading is $58M — a 28.9% year-over-year decrease (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Minority Interest is one piece of Equity Lifestyle Properties's financial statement story. At $58M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for ELS's minority interest usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Equity Lifestyle Properties's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Equity Lifestyle Properties against Finance peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Finance are more comparable, which makes gaps in minority interest easier to interpret. Start with $58M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.