BackElicera Therapeutics AB (publ) Overview

Elicera Therapeutics AB (publ) Receivables

Track Elicera Therapeutics AB (publ)'s receivables ($1.5M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Receivables
$1.47M
↑ 18.76% YoYΔ $232681.00 vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Elicera Therapeutics AB (publ) Receivables History

Loading

Elicera Therapeutics AB (publ) vs. peers: Receivables Comparison

Loading

Elicera Therapeutics AB (publ) Receivables Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Elicera Therapeutics AB (publ) (ELIC.ST) FAQ

Elicera Therapeutics AB (publ) posts a receivables of $1.5M as of June 2026. That compares with $1.2M in the prior-year period — up 18.8% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Elicera Therapeutics AB (publ)'s receivables was $1.2M. The latest reading is $1.5M — a 18.8% year-over-year increase (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Receivables is one piece of Elicera Therapeutics AB (publ)'s financial statement story. At $1.5M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for ELIC.ST's receivables usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Elicera Therapeutics AB (publ)'s other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Elicera Therapeutics AB (publ) against Healthcare peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Healthcare are more comparable, which makes gaps in receivables easier to interpret. Start with $1.5M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.