BackEiger BioPharmaceuticals Overview

Eiger BioPharmaceuticals Net Tangible Assets

Track Eiger BioPharmaceuticals's net tangible assets ($-14M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Net Tangible Assets
$-14.46M
126.14% YoYΔ $-69.77M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Eiger BioPharmaceuticals Net Tangible Assets History

Loading

Eiger BioPharmaceuticals vs. peers: Net Tangible Assets Comparison

Loading

Eiger BioPharmaceuticals Net Tangible Assets Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Eiger BioPharmaceuticals (EIGRQ) FAQ

Eiger BioPharmaceuticals posts a net tangible assets of $-14M as of December 2023. That compares with $55M in the prior-year period — down 126.1% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Eiger BioPharmaceuticals's net tangible assets was $55M. The latest reading is $-14M — a 126.1% year-over-year decrease (period ending December 2023). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Net Tangible Assets is one piece of Eiger BioPharmaceuticals's financial statement story. At $-14M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for EIGRQ's net tangible assets usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Eiger BioPharmaceuticals's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Eiger BioPharmaceuticals against Healthcare peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Healthcare are more comparable, which makes gaps in net tangible assets easier to interpret. Start with $-14M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.