BackeFFECTOR Therapeutics- Warrants (26/08/2026) Overview

eFFECTOR Therapeutics- Warrants (26/08/2026) Net Tangible Assets

Latest net tangible assets for EFTRW: $220M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Net Tangible Assets
$215.09M
969571.72% YoYΔ $215.11M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

eFFECTOR Therapeutics- Warrants (26/08/2026) Net Tangible Assets History

Loading

eFFECTOR Therapeutics- Warrants (26/08/2026) vs. peers: Net Tangible Assets Comparison

Loading

eFFECTOR Therapeutics- Warrants (26/08/2026) Net Tangible Assets Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

eFFECTOR Therapeutics- Warrants (26/08/2026) (EFTRW) FAQ

eFFECTOR Therapeutics- Warrants (26/08/2026) posts a net tangible assets of $220M as of March 2026. That compares with $-22K in the prior-year period — up 969571.7% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, eFFECTOR Therapeutics- Warrants (26/08/2026)'s net tangible assets was $-22K. The latest reading is $220M — a 969571.7% year-over-year increase (period ending March 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Net Tangible Assets is one piece of eFFECTOR Therapeutics- Warrants (26/08/2026)'s financial statement story. At $220M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for EFTRW's net tangible assets usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; eFFECTOR Therapeutics- Warrants (26/08/2026)'s other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging eFFECTOR Therapeutics- Warrants (26/08/2026) against Healthcare peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Healthcare are more comparable, which makes gaps in net tangible assets easier to interpret. Start with $220M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.