BackEpicQuest Education Group International Limited Overview

EpicQuest Education Group International Limited Receivables

Track EpicQuest Education Group International Limited's receivables ($2.3M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Receivables
$2.28M
2153.34% YoYΔ $2.18M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

EpicQuest Education Group International Limited Receivables History

Loading

EpicQuest Education Group International Limited vs. peers: Receivables Comparison

Loading

EpicQuest Education Group International Limited Receivables Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

EpicQuest Education Group International Limited (EEIQ) FAQ

EpicQuest Education Group International Limited posts a receivables of $2.3M as of March 2026. That compares with $100K in the prior-year period — up 2153.3% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, EpicQuest Education Group International Limited's receivables was $100K. The latest reading is $2.3M — a 2153.3% year-over-year increase (period ending March 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Receivables is one piece of EpicQuest Education Group International Limited's financial statement story. At $2.3M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for EEIQ's receivables usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; EpicQuest Education Group International Limited's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging EpicQuest Education Group International Limited against Consumer Discretionary peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Consumer Discretionary are more comparable, which makes gaps in receivables easier to interpret. Start with $2.3M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.