BackEl Capitan Precious Metals Overview

El Capitan Precious Metals Net Tangible Assets

El Capitan Precious Metals's net tangible assets is $-350K.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Net Tangible Assets
$-351628.00
129.18% YoYΔ $-1.56M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

El Capitan Precious Metals Net Tangible Assets History

Loading

El Capitan Precious Metals vs. peers: Net Tangible Assets Comparison

Loading

El Capitan Precious Metals Net Tangible Assets Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

El Capitan Precious Metals (ECPN) FAQ

El Capitan Precious Metals posts a net tangible assets of $-350K as of September 2017. That compares with $1.2M in the prior-year period — down 129.2% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, El Capitan Precious Metals's net tangible assets was $1.2M. The latest reading is $-350K — a 129.2% year-over-year decrease (period ending September 2017). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Net Tangible Assets is one piece of El Capitan Precious Metals's financial statement story. At $-350K, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for ECPN's net tangible assets usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; El Capitan Precious Metals's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging El Capitan Precious Metals against Materials peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Materials are more comparable, which makes gaps in net tangible assets easier to interpret. Start with $-350K here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.