BackEverus Construction Group Overview

Everus Construction Group Other Current Liabilities

Everus Construction Group's other current liabilities is $470M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Other Current Liabilities
$474.14M
429.82% YoYΔ $384.65M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Everus Construction Group Other Current Liabilities History

Loading

Everus Construction Group vs. peers: Other Current Liabilities Comparison

Loading

Everus Construction Group Other Current Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Everus Construction Group (ECG) FAQ

Everus Construction Group posts a other current liabilities of $470M as of March 2026. That compares with $89M in the prior-year period — up 429.8% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Everus Construction Group's other current liabilities was $89M. The latest reading is $470M — a 429.8% year-over-year increase (period ending March 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Other Current Liabilities is one piece of Everus Construction Group's financial statement story. At $470M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for ECG's other current liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Everus Construction Group's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Everus Construction Group against Industrials peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Industrials are more comparable, which makes gaps in other current liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $470M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.