BackHarbor ETF Trust - Harbor AlphaEdge Small Cap Earners ETF Overview

Harbor ETF Trust - Harbor AlphaEdge Small Cap Earners ETF Gross Profit

Track Harbor ETF Trust - Harbor AlphaEdge Small Cap Earners ETF's gross profit ($58M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow

Quarterly Gross Profit

$15.71M
14.2% YoY

As of Mar 31, 2019

Annual Gross Profit (TTM)

$58.38M
10.04% YoY

Trailing 12 months ending Mar 31, 2019

Average Gross Profit (Comparison Companies)

Gross Profit History

Gross Profit Comparison

Annual Gross Profit Growth Rate (%)

Annual Gross Profit Growth (Absolute)

Harbor ETF Trust - Harbor AlphaEdge Small Cap Earners ETF (EBIT) FAQ

The latest gross profit for EBIT is $58M as of March 2019. That compares with $53M in the prior-year period — up 10.0% year over year. That is below the sector sector average of $760M. Investors often review this figure alongside Harbor ETF Trust - Harbor AlphaEdge Small Cap Earners ETF's historical trend and sector peers before judging valuation or financial health.

Over the past year, EBIT's gross profit moved from $53M to $58M — a 10.0% year-over-year increase. If the trend continues in the same direction for several quarters, it can signal a meaningful shift in Harbor ETF Trust - Harbor AlphaEdge Small Cap Earners ETF's operating scale or balance-sheet position.

Against its sector companies, EBIT currently prints $58M for gross profit, while the sector average sits near $760M. That is roughly 92.3% below the sector mean. Large gaps often invite a closer look at Harbor ETF Trust - Harbor AlphaEdge Small Cap Earners ETF's growth, margins, and balance sheet.

A gross profit figure of $58M for EBIT is a snapshot of scale on that line item. On its own it does not say whether the business is healthy — you also want growth rate, margins, and how the number compares with similar companies. The sector average is about $760M. Explore the charts below for those layers of context.

After noting EBIT's gross profit ($58M), review year-over-year change from $53M, peer averages, and a few neighboring metrics such as revenue, margins, or valuation multiples. That combination usually beats staring at a single figure. The navigation links on this page jump you to those related views.