BackDistribution Solutions Group Overview

Distribution Solutions Group Intangible Assets

Track Distribution Solutions Group's intangible assets ($140M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Intangible Assets
$138.57M
46.43% YoYΔ $-120.11M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Distribution Solutions Group Intangible Assets History

Loading

Distribution Solutions Group vs. peers: Intangible Assets Comparison

Loading

Distribution Solutions Group Intangible Assets Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Distribution Solutions Group (DSGR) FAQ

Distribution Solutions Group posts a intangible assets of $140M as of March 2026. That compares with $260M in the prior-year period — down 46.4% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Distribution Solutions Group's intangible assets was $260M. The latest reading is $140M — a 46.4% year-over-year decrease (period ending March 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Intangible Assets is one piece of Distribution Solutions Group's financial statement story. At $140M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for DSGR's intangible assets usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Distribution Solutions Group's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Distribution Solutions Group against Industrials peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Industrials are more comparable, which makes gaps in intangible assets easier to interpret. Start with $140M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.