Leonardo DRS Inc.
DRS
Get informed when a big investor buys or sells
+ Follow
Current Fair Value
55.3% downsideOvervalued by 55.3% based on the discounted cash flow analysis.
Share Statistics
| Market cap | $11.77 Billion |
|---|---|
| Enterprise Value | $12.36 Billion |
| Dividend Yield | $0.36 (0.82%) |
| Earnings per Share | $1.05 |
| Beta | 0.19 |
| Outstanding Shares | 265,300,000 |
Return
| Return on Equity | 10.47% |
|---|---|
| Return on Assets | 6.89% |
| Return on Invested Capital | 11.53% |
Valuation & Multiples
| P/E Ratio | 40.87 |
|---|---|
| PEG | 170.29 |
| Price to Sales | 3.7 |
| Price to Book Ratio | 4.82 |
| Enterprise Value to Revenue | 3.34 |
| Enterprise Value to EBIT | 34.52 |
| Enterprise Value to Net Income | 42 |
| Total Debt to Enterprise | 0.07 |
| Debt to Equity | 0.33 |
Revenue Sources
No data
Insider Trades
Last Earnings Call
Next Earnings Call
Institutional Put/Call Ratio
Market sentiment based on institutional option activity.
| Put/Call Ratio | 0.0000▼ 30.37% |
|---|---|
| Total Calls | -▼ 100.00% |
| Total Puts | -▼ 100.00% |
Institutional Ownership
Holdings and activity of institutional investors.
| Ownership % | 0.16%▼ 25.71% |
|---|---|
| Total Invested | $18.42M▼ 99.40% |
| Investors Holding | 41▼ 311.00% |
ESG Score
No data
About Leonardo DRS Inc.
6,650 employeesRelevant Senate Committees
This committee allocates the actual discretionary federal spending. Its subcommittees determine the precise funding for defense programs, directly impacting the cash flow and order books for defense contractors like Leonardo DRS.
This committee directly oversees the Department of Defense and authorizes the annual National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), which determines programs, procurement, and R&D funding crucial for defense contractors like Leonardo DRS.
Members receive classified briefings on global threats and intelligence needs, directly impacting the demand for and development of advanced defense and intelligence systems, which are core to Leonardo DRS's business. This provides significant informational asymmetry.