BackDynagas LNG Partners LP - Unit Overview

Dynagas LNG Partners LP - Unit Current Assets

Latest current assets for DLNG: $59M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Current Assets
$59.49M
↓ 32.48% YoYΔ $-28.61M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Dynagas LNG Partners LP - Unit Current Assets History

Loading

Dynagas LNG Partners LP - Unit vs. peers: Current Assets Comparison

Loading

Dynagas LNG Partners LP - Unit Current Assets Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Dynagas LNG Partners LP - Unit (DLNG) FAQ

Dynagas LNG Partners LP - Unit posts a current assets of $59M as of June 2026. That compares with $88M in the prior-year period — down 32.5% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Dynagas LNG Partners LP - Unit's current assets was $88M. The latest reading is $59M — a 32.5% year-over-year decrease (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Current Assets is one piece of Dynagas LNG Partners LP - Unit's financial statement story. At $59M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for DLNG's current assets usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Dynagas LNG Partners LP - Unit's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Dynagas LNG Partners LP - Unit against Consumer Discretionary peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Consumer Discretionary are more comparable, which makes gaps in current assets easier to interpret. Start with $59M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.