BackDelek Logistics Partners LP - Unit Overview

Delek Logistics Partners LP - Unit Net Tangible Assets

Delek Logistics Partners LP - Unit's net tangible assets is $-69M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Net Tangible Assets
$-69.29M
316.60% YoYΔ $-101.28M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Delek Logistics Partners LP - Unit Net Tangible Assets History

Loading

Delek Logistics Partners LP - Unit vs. peers: Net Tangible Assets Comparison

Loading

Delek Logistics Partners LP - Unit Net Tangible Assets Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Delek Logistics Partners LP - Unit (DKL) FAQ

Delek Logistics Partners LP - Unit posts a net tangible assets of $-69M as of June 2026. That compares with $32M in the prior-year period — down 316.6% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Delek Logistics Partners LP - Unit's net tangible assets was $32M. The latest reading is $-69M — a 316.6% year-over-year decrease (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Net Tangible Assets is one piece of Delek Logistics Partners LP - Unit's financial statement story. At $-69M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for DKL's net tangible assets usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Delek Logistics Partners LP - Unit's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Delek Logistics Partners LP - Unit against Energy peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Energy are more comparable, which makes gaps in net tangible assets easier to interpret. Start with $-69M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.