BackPT Nusa Konstruksi Enjiniring Tbk Overview

PT Nusa Konstruksi Enjiniring Tbk Receivables

PT Nusa Konstruksi Enjiniring Tbk's receivables is $890B.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Receivables
$886.56B
↑ 45.87% YoYΔ $278.80B vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

PT Nusa Konstruksi Enjiniring Tbk Receivables History

Loading

PT Nusa Konstruksi Enjiniring Tbk vs. peers: Receivables Comparison

Loading

PT Nusa Konstruksi Enjiniring Tbk Receivables Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

PT Nusa Konstruksi Enjiniring Tbk (DGIK.JK) FAQ

PT Nusa Konstruksi Enjiniring Tbk posts a receivables of $890B as of June 2026. That compares with $610B in the prior-year period — up 45.9% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, PT Nusa Konstruksi Enjiniring Tbk's receivables was $610B. The latest reading is $890B — a 45.9% year-over-year increase (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Receivables is one piece of PT Nusa Konstruksi Enjiniring Tbk's financial statement story. At $890B, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for DGIK.JK's receivables usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; PT Nusa Konstruksi Enjiniring Tbk's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging PT Nusa Konstruksi Enjiniring Tbk against Industrials peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Industrials are more comparable, which makes gaps in receivables easier to interpret. Start with $890B here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.