BackDeFi Development Overview

DeFi Development Receivables

Track DeFi Development's receivables ($0) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Receivables
$0.00
↓ 100.00% YoYΔ $-1.12M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

DeFi Development Receivables History

Loading

DeFi Development vs. peers: Receivables Comparison

Loading

DeFi Development Receivables Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Balance Sheet Breakdown

Current CashShort Term InvestmentsReceivablesInventoryOther Current AssetsCurrent AssetsLong Term InvestmentsProperty Plant EquipmentGoodwillIntangible AssetsOther AssetsTotal AssetsNet Tangible AssetsAccounts PayableOther Current LiabilitiesTotal Current LiabilitiesLong Term DebtOther LiabilitiesMinority InterestTotal Liabilities

DeFi Development (DFDVW) FAQ

DeFi Development posts a receivables of $0 as of June 2026. That compares with $1.1M in the prior-year period — down 100.0% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, DeFi Development's receivables was $1.1M. The latest reading is $0 — a 100.0% year-over-year decrease (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Receivables is one piece of DeFi Development's financial statement story. At $0, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for DFDVW's receivables usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; DeFi Development's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging DeFi Development against Finance peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Finance are more comparable, which makes gaps in receivables easier to interpret. Start with $0 here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.