BackEasterly Government Properties Overview

Easterly Government Properties Current Cash

Track Easterly Government Properties's current cash ($3.3M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Current Cash
$3.30M
↓ 29.74% YoYΔ $-1.40M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Easterly Government Properties Current Cash History

Loading

Easterly Government Properties vs. peers: Current Cash Comparison

Loading

Easterly Government Properties Cash Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Easterly Government Properties (DEA) FAQ

Easterly Government Properties posts a current cash of $3.3M as of June 2026. That compares with $4.7M in the prior-year period — down 29.7% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Easterly Government Properties's current cash was $4.7M. The latest reading is $3.3M — a 29.7% year-over-year decrease (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Current Cash is one piece of Easterly Government Properties's financial statement story. At $3.3M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for DEA's current cash usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Easterly Government Properties's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Easterly Government Properties against Finance peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Finance are more comparable, which makes gaps in current cash easier to interpret. Start with $3.3M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.