BackCitizens Financial Services Overview

Citizens Financial Services Net Tangible Assets

Citizens Financial Services's net tangible assets is $350M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Net Tangible Assets
$352.83M
12.49% YoYΔ $39.18M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Citizens Financial Services Net Tangible Assets History

Loading

Citizens Financial Services vs. peers: Net Tangible Assets Comparison

Loading

Citizens Financial Services Net Tangible Assets Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Citizens Financial Services (CZFS) FAQ

Citizens Financial Services posts a net tangible assets of $350M as of June 2026. That compares with $310M in the prior-year period — up 12.5% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Citizens Financial Services's net tangible assets was $310M. The latest reading is $350M — a 12.5% year-over-year increase (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Net Tangible Assets is one piece of Citizens Financial Services's financial statement story. At $350M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for CZFS's net tangible assets usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Citizens Financial Services's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Citizens Financial Services against Finance peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Finance are more comparable, which makes gaps in net tangible assets easier to interpret. Start with $350M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.