BackCamping World Holdings Overview

Camping World Holdings Net Tangible Assets

Track Camping World Holdings's net tangible assets ($400M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Net Tangible Assets
$398.80M
22.80% YoYΔ $-117.78M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Camping World Holdings Net Tangible Assets History

Loading

Camping World Holdings vs. peers: Net Tangible Assets Comparison

Loading

Camping World Holdings Net Tangible Assets Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Camping World Holdings (CWH) FAQ

Camping World Holdings posts a net tangible assets of $400M as of June 2026. That compares with $520M in the prior-year period — down 22.8% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Camping World Holdings's net tangible assets was $520M. The latest reading is $400M — a 22.8% year-over-year decrease (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Net Tangible Assets is one piece of Camping World Holdings's financial statement story. At $400M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for CWH's net tangible assets usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Camping World Holdings's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Camping World Holdings against Consumer Discretionary peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Consumer Discretionary are more comparable, which makes gaps in net tangible assets easier to interpret. Start with $400M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.