BackChina Oriental Group Company Limited Overview

China Oriental Group Company Limited Receivables

Latest receivables for CUGCF: $7.2B.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Receivables
$7.15B
↑ 40.13% YoYΔ $2.05B vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

China Oriental Group Company Limited Receivables History

Loading

China Oriental Group Company Limited vs. peers: Receivables Comparison

Loading

China Oriental Group Company Limited Receivables Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

China Oriental Group Company Limited (CUGCF) FAQ

China Oriental Group Company Limited posts a receivables of $7.2B as of June 2026. That compares with $5.1B in the prior-year period — up 40.1% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, China Oriental Group Company Limited's receivables was $5.1B. The latest reading is $7.2B — a 40.1% year-over-year increase (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Receivables is one piece of China Oriental Group Company Limited's financial statement story. At $7.2B, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for CUGCF's receivables usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; China Oriental Group Company Limited's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging China Oriental Group Company Limited against Materials peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Materials are more comparable, which makes gaps in receivables easier to interpret. Start with $7.2B here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.