BackCustom Truck One Source Overview

Custom Truck One Source Other Current Liabilities

Latest other current liabilities for CTOS: $77M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Other Current Liabilities
$77.37M
8835.55% YoYΔ $76.51M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Custom Truck One Source Other Current Liabilities History

Loading

Custom Truck One Source vs. peers: Other Current Liabilities Comparison

Loading

Custom Truck One Source Other Current Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Custom Truck One Source (CTOS) FAQ

Custom Truck One Source posts a other current liabilities of $77M as of March 2026. That compares with $870K in the prior-year period — up 8835.5% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Custom Truck One Source's other current liabilities was $870K. The latest reading is $77M — a 8835.5% year-over-year increase (period ending March 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Other Current Liabilities is one piece of Custom Truck One Source's financial statement story. At $77M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for CTOS's other current liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Custom Truck One Source's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Custom Truck One Source against Real Estate peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Real Estate are more comparable, which makes gaps in other current liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $77M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.