BackChicken Soup for the Soul Entertainment Overview

Chicken Soup for the Soul Entertainment Receivables

Latest receivables for CSSE: $140M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Receivables
$138.16M
7.86% YoYΔ $-11.78M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Chicken Soup for the Soul Entertainment Receivables History

Loading

Chicken Soup for the Soul Entertainment vs. peers: Receivables Comparison

Loading

Chicken Soup for the Soul Entertainment Receivables Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Chicken Soup for the Soul Entertainment (CSSE) FAQ

Chicken Soup for the Soul Entertainment posts a receivables of $140M as of March 2024. That compares with $150M in the prior-year period — down 7.9% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Chicken Soup for the Soul Entertainment's receivables was $150M. The latest reading is $140M — a 7.9% year-over-year decrease (period ending March 2024). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Receivables is one piece of Chicken Soup for the Soul Entertainment's financial statement story. At $140M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for CSSE's receivables usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Chicken Soup for the Soul Entertainment's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Chicken Soup for the Soul Entertainment against Consumer Discretionary peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Consumer Discretionary are more comparable, which makes gaps in receivables easier to interpret. Start with $140M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.