BackCarlisle Companies Overview

Carlisle Companies Long Term Debt

Track Carlisle Companies's long-term debt ($2.9B) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Long Term Debt
$2.88B

Peer average

Loading

Carlisle Companies Long Term Debt History

Loading

Carlisle Companies vs. peers: Long Term Debt Comparison

Loading

Carlisle Companies Long Term Debt Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Balance Sheet Breakdown

Current CashShort Term InvestmentsReceivablesInventoryOther Current AssetsCurrent AssetsLong Term InvestmentsProperty Plant EquipmentGoodwillIntangible AssetsOther AssetsTotal AssetsNet Tangible AssetsAccounts PayableOther Current LiabilitiesTotal Current LiabilitiesLong Term DebtOther LiabilitiesMinority InterestTotal Liabilities

Carlisle Companies (CSL) FAQ

Carlisle Companies (CSL) currently reports a long-term debt of $2.9B as of June 2026. In the prior-year period, the figure was $0. Use the charts on this page to explore Carlisle Companies's long-term debt history and peer comparisons.

Carlisle Companies's long-term debt changed from $0 to $2.9B (period ending June 2026). Watching multi-year history on the chart below helps separate one-off swings from a lasting trend.

Carlisle Companies reported $2.9B in long-term debt as of June 2026. In the prior-year period, the figure was $0. Absolute dollar amounts are most useful when compared with prior periods, peers, and related line items such as revenue, assets, or liabilities on Stockcircle.

Start with the current long-term debt of $2.9B, then check the historical chart for trend and the peer comparison chart for relative positioning. From there, open related valuation or income-statement pages for Carlisle Companies, and consider following CSL for alerts when major investors trade the stock.

Carlisle Companies is classified in the Materials sector. On long-term debt, it currently shows $2.9B. Sector peers often share similar capital intensity and growth regimes, so relative rankings inside Materials are usually more informative than comparing CSL with unrelated industries.