BackCharles River Laboratories International Overview

Charles River Laboratories International Receivables

Charles River Laboratories International's receivables is $700M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Receivables
$700.25M
7.45% YoYΔ $-56.38M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Charles River Laboratories International Receivables History

Loading

Charles River Laboratories International vs. peers: Receivables Comparison

Loading

Charles River Laboratories International Receivables Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Charles River Laboratories International (CRL) FAQ

Charles River Laboratories International posts a receivables of $700M as of March 2026. That compares with $760M in the prior-year period — down 7.5% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Charles River Laboratories International's receivables was $760M. The latest reading is $700M — a 7.5% year-over-year decrease (period ending March 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Receivables is one piece of Charles River Laboratories International's financial statement story. At $700M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for CRL's receivables usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Charles River Laboratories International's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Charles River Laboratories International against Healthcare peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Healthcare are more comparable, which makes gaps in receivables easier to interpret. Start with $700M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.