BackChina Resources Land Limited Overview

China Resources Land Limited Net Tangible Assets

China Resources Land Limited's net tangible assets is $420B.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Net Tangible Assets
$419.53B
5.74% YoYΔ $22.79B vs prior year quarter

Peer average / median

Loading

China Resources Land Limited Net Tangible Assets History

Loading

China Resources Land Limited vs. peers: Net Tangible Assets Comparison

Loading

China Resources Land Limited Net Tangible Assets Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

China Resources Land Limited (CRBJF) FAQ

China Resources Land Limited posts a net tangible assets of $420B as of December 2025. That compares with $400B in the prior-year period — up 5.7% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, China Resources Land Limited's net tangible assets was $400B. The latest reading is $420B — a 5.7% year-over-year increase (period ending December 2025). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Net Tangible Assets is one piece of China Resources Land Limited's financial statement story. At $420B, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for CRBJF's net tangible assets usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; China Resources Land Limited's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging China Resources Land Limited against Real Estate peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Real Estate are more comparable, which makes gaps in net tangible assets easier to interpret. Start with $420B here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.