BackCowen- 7.75% NT REDEEM 15/06/2033 USD 25 Overview

Cowen- 7.75% NT REDEEM 15/06/2033 USD 25 Other Current Liabilities

Latest other current liabilities for COWNL: $6.7B.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Other Current Liabilities
$6.74B
1.03% YoYΔ $68.92M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Cowen- 7.75% NT REDEEM 15/06/2033 USD 25 Other Current Liabilities History

Loading

Cowen- 7.75% NT REDEEM 15/06/2033 USD 25 vs. peers: Other Current Liabilities Comparison

Loading

Cowen- 7.75% NT REDEEM 15/06/2033 USD 25 Other Current Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Cowen- 7.75% NT REDEEM 15/06/2033 USD 25 (COWNL) FAQ

Cowen- 7.75% NT REDEEM 15/06/2033 USD 25 posts a other current liabilities of $6.7B as of December 2022. That compares with $6.7B in the prior-year period — up 1.0% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Cowen- 7.75% NT REDEEM 15/06/2033 USD 25's other current liabilities was $6.7B. The latest reading is $6.7B — a 1.0% year-over-year increase (period ending December 2022). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Other Current Liabilities is one piece of Cowen- 7.75% NT REDEEM 15/06/2033 USD 25's financial statement story. At $6.7B, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for COWNL's other current liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Cowen- 7.75% NT REDEEM 15/06/2033 USD 25's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Cowen- 7.75% NT REDEEM 15/06/2033 USD 25 against Finance peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Finance are more comparable, which makes gaps in other current liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $6.7B here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.