BackCollegium Pharmaceutical Overview

Collegium Pharmaceutical Net Tangible Assets

Track Collegium Pharmaceutical's net tangible assets ($310M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Net Tangible Assets
$311.91M
34.32% YoYΔ $79.70M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Collegium Pharmaceutical Net Tangible Assets History

Loading

Collegium Pharmaceutical vs. peers: Net Tangible Assets Comparison

Loading

Collegium Pharmaceutical Net Tangible Assets Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Collegium Pharmaceutical (COLL) FAQ

Collegium Pharmaceutical posts a net tangible assets of $310M as of June 2026. That compares with $230M in the prior-year period — up 34.3% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Collegium Pharmaceutical's net tangible assets was $230M. The latest reading is $310M — a 34.3% year-over-year increase (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Net Tangible Assets is one piece of Collegium Pharmaceutical's financial statement story. At $310M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for COLL's net tangible assets usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Collegium Pharmaceutical's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Collegium Pharmaceutical against Healthcare peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Healthcare are more comparable, which makes gaps in net tangible assets easier to interpret. Start with $310M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.