BackChoiceone Financial Services Overview

Choiceone Financial Services Net Tangible Assets

Choiceone Financial Services's net tangible assets is $470M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Net Tangible Assets
$469.81M
↓ 89.07% YoYΔ $-3.83B vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Choiceone Financial Services Net Tangible Assets History

Loading

Choiceone Financial Services vs. peers: Net Tangible Assets Comparison

Loading

Choiceone Financial Services Net Tangible Assets Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Choiceone Financial Services (COFS) FAQ

Choiceone Financial Services posts a net tangible assets of $470M as of September 2026. That compares with $4.3B in the prior-year period — down 89.1% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Choiceone Financial Services's net tangible assets was $4.3B. The latest reading is $470M — a 89.1% year-over-year decrease (period ending September 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Net Tangible Assets is one piece of Choiceone Financial Services's financial statement story. At $470M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for COFS's net tangible assets usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Choiceone Financial Services's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Choiceone Financial Services against Finance peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Finance are more comparable, which makes gaps in net tangible assets easier to interpret. Start with $470M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.